International Edition


April 29, 2017

Breaking News, World News and Taiwan News.
About Us
Contact Us

Chen Wei-ting handed fine of NT$10,000 over shoe-throwing incident

The Miaoli Distirct Court yesterday ruled that student activist Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷) must pay a fine of NT$10,000 for throwing a shoe that hit Miaoli Magistrate Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻) over the controversial Dapu demolitions in 2013.

Chen, Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) and five other student activists were indicted by prosecutors for alleged public insult and allegedly violating the Assembly and Parade Act over a series of protests that were related to the Dapu land expropriations last year.

The court yesterday morning released its ruling, saying that apart from Chen, the rest of the six suspects were not guilty. As for Chen, the court said he is sentenced to pay the fine for the charge of public insult.

Chang Sen-wen (張森文), one of the owners of the four demolished households in the village, was found dead under Dapu Bridge on the afternoon of Sept. 18.

Later that night Liu went to the late Chang's residence to offer his condolences to his family. At the time, Chen was at the residence and scolded Liu and threw a shoe at the magistrate which hit him in the head.

The court explained the ruling, saying that to throw a shoe, especially a dirty shoe, at a person will harm the person's self-esteem. The court said such behavior is an inappropriate approach to express one's opinions. The court, at the same time, ruled that Chen's shoe should be confiscated.

After hearing of the ruling in Miaoli, Chen told a press interview that he will file an appeal against the ruling. He said he will also request to have his shoe back. Chen's lawyer echoed Chen's remark, saying that they will fight for Chen's innocence.

The Miaoli County Government said once it receives the official ruling from the court, it will consult and discuss the issue with legal exerts, and then decide whether or not to appeal against the ruling.

1 Comment
July 12, 2014    Upwell@
At last a judicial ruling that makes sense. There is a lot of ways to express one's views. But throwing things around whether it's a shoe or a bomb is not consistent with common politeness or decency. I am sure if that Chen person has a family with children of his own he would not accept his children throwing things at him if they disagree with him. So why should others especially a public official has to tolerate his bad and childish behaviour. Perhaps if he appeals the appellate court should consider enhancing the sentence to show distaste for wasting judicial time and public resources.
Write a Comment
CAPTCHA Code Image
Type in image code
Change the code
 Receive our promos
 Respond to this email
Subscribe  |   Advertise  |   RSS Feed  |   About Us  |   Career  |   Contact Us
Sitemap  |   Top Stories  |   Taiwan  |   China  |   Business  |   Asia  |   World  |   Sports  |   Life  |   Arts & Leisure  |   Health  |   Editorial  |   Commentary
Travel  |   Movies  |   TV Listings  |   Classifieds  |   Bookstore  |   Getting Around  |   Weather  |   Guide Post  |   Student Post  |   Terms of Use  |   Sitemap
  chinapost search