News Videos
International Edition


May 25, 2017

Breaking News, World News and Taiwan News.
About Us
Contact Us

China's bulb ban predicted to aid LED firms

Taiwan manufacturers of light-emitting diodes (LED) may take advantage of China's move to ban imports and sales of incandescent bulbs of over 100 watts, analysts said yesterday.

The ban, imposed jointly by various Chinese government agencies including the Ministry of Commerce, took effect yesterday and is seen as China's latest effort to eliminate incandescent bulbs altogether, analysts said.

The Chinese government announced in August last year the country's incandescent bulb elimination would begin on Oct. 1, 2012, in separate phases based on power and illumination.

On Oct. 1, sales and imports of 100-watt incandescent bulbs and over for regular illumination purses were to be banned. By Oct. 1, 2016, sales and imports of bulbs of 15 watts would also be under the ban, which would eventually terminate the usage of incandescent bulbs in China.

According to industry players, China's move follows similar actions by the European Union, which has found incandescent bulbs to be power consuming and unenvironmental.

Back in March 2007, the European Union published a roadmap for the elimination of incandescent bulbs. At the end of 2008, the 27 member nations of EU reached an agreement to ban sales of incandescent bulbs by the end of 2012 and replace them with bulbs that save more energy.

This trend may benefit Taiwan's manufacturers of LED bulbs, which are three to four times more expensive than regular incandescent bulbs. Reducing prices and maintaining profitability remains a challenge, analysts said.

1 Comment
October 2, 2012    reipost@
The ban makes no sense - for any reason - including the negligible savings
To begin with energy saving is not the only reason to choose lighting, given the advantages incandescent can have in light quality, appearance, purchase price and other matters.

Whatever some private savings from changing a few bulbs, society savings are negligible....
"The total reduction in energy use would be 0.54 x 0.8 x 0.76% = 0.33%,
This figure is almost certainly an overestimate....
Which begs the question: is it really worth it?
Politicians are forcing a change to a particular technology which is fine for some applications but not universally liked, and which has disadvantages.
The problem is that legislators are unable to tackle the big issues of energy use effectively, so go for the soft target of a high profile domestic use of energy...
...This is gesture politics."
Cambridge University Network reflecting the views of Physics Professors and other scientists from several institutions, similarly with university energy department communications from Canada, Germany, Finland and other countries.
Write a Comment
CAPTCHA Code Image
Type in image code
Change the code
 Receive our promos
 Respond to this email
Subscribe  |   Advertise  |   RSS Feed  |   About Us  |   Career  |   Contact Us
Sitemap  |   Top Stories  |   Taiwan  |   China  |   Business  |   Asia  |   World  |   Sports  |   Life  |   Arts & Leisure  |   Health  |   Editorial  |   Commentary
Travel  |   Movies  |   TV Listings  |   Classifieds  |   Bookstore  |   Getting Around  |   Weather  |   Guide Post  |   Student Post  |   Terms of Use  |   Sitemap
  chinapost search