Respect grand justices' interpretation: Hsieh

The Council of Grand Justices on Friday ruled in a constitutional interpretation that the move by the Taipei District Court to switch the judges in its trial of Chen's case was “constitutional.”

“Although many people may be unhappy with the result, we still have to respect the (judicial) system,” Hsieh said while attending the inauguration of a campaign office for the Democratic Progressive Party's nominee in December's Changhua County magistrate election.

The Taipei District Court decided late last year to have a three-judge panel led by Tsai Shou-shun take charge of all cases involving the ex-president, instead of the original panel hearing his case headed by Cho Chan-shun.

Chen was indicted on several charges, including receiving bribes, money laundering and embezzlement.

The Taipei court said it decided to change judges because the Tsai panel was responsible for the trial of Wu Shu-jen, Chen's wife, who was indicted on charges of illegally siphoning NT$104 million from the president's discretionary state affairs fund while her husband was in office, and that combining the cases of Chen and Wu was appropriate.

Chen and his wife were given life sentences and fines of NT$200 million and NT$300 million respectively by the Taipei court on Sept. 11. They have both appealed the verdict.

The court's move prompted Chen to petition the Council of Grand Justices for an interpretation on whether the change in judges was unconstitutional.

Tsai, who on Dec. 31 ruled to detain Chen after taking into account the seriousness of the crimes committed by the former president, and the possibility that he might flee or collude with witnesses, has since then repeatedly acted to keep Chen in custody.

Subscribe to The China Post and save 25%. Click here

SharePrintEmail

Write a Comment

Terms

Enter your comments - 3000 characters max

Type in image code

Submit

 Receive China Post promos
 Respond to this email