OPCW hopes Nobel will speed up ban
By Svren Billing, AFPOSLO--The body tasked with ridding the world of chemical weapons picked up its Nobel Peace Prize in a ceremony in Oslo Tuesday after saying it hoped the prestige would speed a global ban on the dreaded arms.
December 11, 2013, 12:30 am TWN
Eliminating such weapons is “a noble cause,” the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)'s director general, Ahmet Uzumcu, said Monday.
A handful of countries, including Israel, Egypt and North Korea, are not implementing a global ban watched over by the OPCW.
The Hague-based watchdog was thrust from obscurity into the spotlight this year because of its lead role in organizing the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons, whose use nearly propelled the United States into a new Middle East war.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee's October 11 announcement that the OPCW won the Nobel Peace Prize for its efforts has further elevated its reputation.
The body notably intends to use the eight million Swedish kronor (US$1.2 million, 898,000 euros) that comes with the prize in the ceremony Tuesday to establish its own annual award.
“Hopefully in the near future we will be able to do away with a whole category of weapons, chemical weapons,” the chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Thorbjoern Jagland, said Monday.
Peace Prize Previously Awarded to Mandela
The honor bestowed on the OPCW brings it into an elite group of people and organizations seen as having promoted peace in the world — including Nelson Mandela, whose memorial service in South Africa was also held on Tuesday.
Since the global ban on producing and storing chemical weapons came into force in 1997, 190 nations have signed up to the Chemical Weapons Convention administered by the OPCW.
More than 80 percent of declared chemical weapons have been destroyed.
But, as the OPCW itself underlines, the job is not yet complete.
Six states remain outside the convention: Israel and Myanmar have signed the pact but not ratified it, while Angola, Egypt, North Korea and South Sudan have failed to do either.
Uzumcu, a Turkish citizen, said Monday: “I see no reason for any country” not to implement the convention.
“I sincerely hope (the others) will reconsider and join this Chemical Weapons Convention,” he added.
Among convention members, the United States and Russia have both pledged to scrap their chemical weapons, but failed to meet a 2012 deadline to do so.