Mexico leader proposes wide-ranging changes to national social programs
By Mark Stevenson, APMEXICO CITY--President Enrique Pena Nieto proposed sweeping changes to Mexico's social programs Sunday, laying out a plan for the country's first nationwide pensions and unemployment insurance to be financed by cutting tax loopholes for big business.
September 10, 2013, 12:04 am TWN
Pena Nieto's proposal had originally been billed as solely an overhaul of the tax system, and it would cut most of the industry-specific tax loopholes written into Mexico's tax codes over decades.
But in his announcement, Pena Nieto went much further. He proposed the country's first carbon tax on fossil fuels used by industry, a levy often touted as a way to combat climate change. He also called for a tax on soft drinks, which he said is needed to combat Mexico's high rate of obesity.
“The tax reform is a social policy reform,” Pena Nieto said in a speech at the presidential residence announcing the plan.
He said he would allow slight deficit spending in 2014 in an effort to spur the flagging economy, institute rules to lure the 60 percent of Mexicans who work in the “informal” sector into tax compliance, and create a stabilization fund to save excess tax revenues from boom years for use during lean times.
Some Mexican local governments, and particularly Mexico City, have experimented with small supplementary payments to the unemployed and people older than 70, but the country as a whole has not had unemployment insurance and it now has a patchwork of pension plans. A privately managed individual retirement system instituted in the 1990s includes only a minority of workers, most of whom have built up only very small balances in their accounts.
Pena Nieto did not provide specifics of the social program plans or tax changes, but said that “those who have more income will pay more.”
He proposed to institute Mexico's capital-gains tax, although he also pledged to abolish the unpopular alternative minimum corporate tax as well as a tax on cash deposits at banks.
The proposals must be approved by both houses of congress and a majority of state legislatures because they involve constitutional changes.