News Videos
International Edition


May 26, 2017

Breaking News, World News and Taiwan News.
About Us
Contact Us

Same-sex marriage hinges on grand justices' ruling

Taiwan has taken one more step toward legalizing same-sex marriage, with the Constitutional Court on Friday setting a date for a public hearing on marriage equality. But there's no promise that the court's ruling will settle the dispute once and for all.

Many observers have pointed out that the 15-member court has seldom held public hearings for opposing sides to debate before the grand justices. But when it has, the rulings have usually been favorable to the petitioners who requested their judgments.

In the present case, the court has scheduled the debate for March 24 in response to pioneering gay rights activist Chi Chia-wei's petition for a judgment on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage, as well as a similar request from the Taipei City Government.

The fact that the highest court of the nation is acting on Chi's petition speaks volumes about the grand justices' attitude, in sharp contrast to the court's outright rejection of Chi's previous petition 16 years ago on the same issue.

Chi and his camp seem to stand a good chance of winning the case this time as five of the seven recently-sworn-in justices to the court reportedly have shown friendly positions toward marriage equality.

And it is beyond doubt that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration sides with the gay rights camp, with President Tsai Ing-wen having shown public support for same-sex marriage. In fact, the pro-same-sex marriage campaign has picked up momentum since Tsai took office, with four bills legalizing same-sex marriage having been forwarded to the Legislature.

Despite the progress and momentum of the campaign, same-sex marriage remains divisive. Many religious and conservative activists have been battling vehemently against same-sex marriage.

Even within the DPP camp there have been differences among lawmakers over how marriage equality should be enforced. Gay rights activists have demanded that the provisions governing marriage in the Civil Code be revised to include same-sex marriage. This would mean that all kinds of married couples — of different or the same sex — are treated equally and enjoy the same rights under the Civil Code.

They are against the writing of special provisions for same-sex-marriage, which they say would be another form of discrimination. But supporters of the writing of a special law — including DPP legislative caucus leader Ker Chien-ming — argue that this approach would be less controversial and more feasible.

1 Comment
February 11, 2017    sanctuary@
The homosexual activists steal the word "gay" to make their sodomy look innocent and fun, then they steal the rainbow to symbolise their sodomy as being bright and colourful and the word "marriage" is being stolen and redefined to suit their purposes in trying to make their sodomy they want to steal the word "adultery" to suit their purposes in breaking up their sodomy "marriages". There is clearly a slippery slope with all of this leading down in to the social sewer of decadency and sexual perversion.

Marriage is far more than just a wedding ceremony and calling someone "husband", "wife" or "partner" and it is also far more than just "two people being in love" (or more likely in today's way of thinking, a lot of marriages are more built on lust rather than love and so they are doomed to fail even before they start). For same sex marriage advocates to say that “You couldn't use term husbands and wife in same-sex marriage, but otherwise it wouldn't be any different to heterosexual marriage” is an incredibly shallow and meaningless view of marriage. Real marriage is a family-based institution for the nurture of children through to the next generation unlike same sex marriage which is a sex-based concept never tried before in the history of human existence. The latter is for the self-gratification of the individual (ie. to make them feel good) and in a political sense, same sex marriage is solely trying to make homosexuality look acceptable - in other words, there is nothing about same sex marriage that compares to real marriage. Real marriage is a millennia-old institution for procreation and male-female marriage is a proven pillar of successful civilisations since the dawn of time. Same sex couples simply don't have the biology to do real marriage and the only way that they can make marriage seem plausible to them is to steal the word "marriage" and redefine it to suit their purposes. Even their idea of having a family is to use artificial reproduction and then deprive a child of a mother or a father. Such a confected lifestyle turns children into mere luxury accessories for selfish homosexual parents.
Write a Comment
CAPTCHA Code Image
Type in image code
Change the code
 Receive our promos
 Respond to this email
Subscribe  |   Advertise  |   RSS Feed  |   About Us  |   Career  |   Contact Us
Sitemap  |   Top Stories  |   Taiwan  |   China  |   Business  |   Asia  |   World  |   Sports  |   Life  |   Arts & Leisure  |   Health  |   Editorial  |   Commentary
Travel  |   Movies  |   TV Listings  |   Classifieds  |   Bookstore  |   Getting Around  |   Weather  |   Guide Post  |   Student Post  |   Terms of Use  |   Sitemap
  chinapost search