|
|
Updated Sunday, July 17, 2011 7:16 pm TWN, The China Post news staff |
| ||||||||||||
A nimble Taiwan can counter 'Assassin's Mace'The cruel fact is that Taiwan can do nothing but be prepared for an increasingly capable mainland military. However, with well-planned preparations Taiwan can still make military conflict prohibitively unsavory for the mainland, thereby adding incentives and bargaining chips for peaceful talks. The idea of the “Assassin's Mace” — a decisive weapon that enables a person to overcome a stronger opponent — is, after all, derived from Chinese culture and is therefore not exclusive to Beijing. Taiwan should move fast in developing its next generation of deterrence strategy on top of its aging fleet of F-16s. An obvious start would be its cyberdefense capability. U.S. military analysts regard cyberwarfare as part of China's assessment denial strategy, meaning the mainland will invest heavily to develop abilities to blind U.S. satellites and jam its electronic devices to slow any military advance or to disable it entirely. With one of the highest Internet literacy rates and strongest IT talent bases in the world, Taiwan could significantly build up its cyberdefense ability to neutralize the neutralizing “Assassin's Mace.” The Chinese (culture, not the nation-state) philosophy of war, as exemplified by Sun Tzu's “The Art of War,” has always valued most highly the avoidance of conflict by creating a condition of strength (military, political or economic) in which victory is a foregone conclusion. With its eyes trained on becoming a global economic superpower, Beijing has all the reasons in the world to avoid military conflict in the Taiwan Strait, but that does not mean it will give up its military options. On the contrary, it is only reasonable that Beijing will try to enhance the strength of its military condition to the point that military victory is all but guaranteed so it can enforce its will on all partners at the negotiation table. What Taiwan should do is not provoke war or engage in an arms race it cannot win, but be nimble in its national defense development. The goal is to maintain the condition of balanced power in which peaceful negotiation is still the best and most reasonable of means to tackle the cross-strait political issue. | |||||||||||||