|
|
Updated Wednesday, November 4, 2009 9:27 am TWN, The China Post news staff 2048: The end of fish?Quite simply, we've reached a fishing tipping point, and Taiwan — while perhaps not the world's worst offender — is still a part of the problem. Taiwanese fishing vessels trawl waters all over the world and many of them employ advanced radar and other modern fishing technologies that enable fleets to wipe out massive schools of fish. Many people would probably not eat a fish that was caught in, say, Hong Kong harbor as common sense dictates that these remaining fish would likely be contaminated with toxins, heavy metals — including cadmium and mercury — and other pollutants. Unfortunately, pollutants are as fluid as water and travel the currents far and wide. The head of the WWF's Hong Kong marine program Guillermo Moreno told the AFP news service that bluefin tuna caught in the middle of beautiful waters in the vast Pacific Ocean invariably contain mercury. Fish are a source of nutrition for a huge percentage of the world's population. As an island nation, Taiwan's residents love seafood, and demand for it has only increased alongside the island's increase in prosperity over the last half-century. At the close of his Hong Kong investigation, reporter Lawrence Bartlett poses a valid question: Seeing as fish are being hunted to extinction and are heavily polluted as well, is it still acceptable — from a health and moral perspective — to eat fish? Vegetarians would obviously argue that consuming fish is unnecessary and their lifestyle choice is certainly worth pondering. But for most of the carnivores of the world, a total ban on fish isn't going to fly. Luckily, there are some options for fish-lovers including sustainable fish farms, wild stream fish and swapping certain “name-brand” fish for other more plentiful species. These plans however would likely require that the price of fish go up considerably, something many people will find difficult to accept. We are faced with two choices: The first is to selfishly enjoy the last few decades of fish before accepting mass extinctions. The second is to take a long-term view and sacrifice for the good of the future. |
| |||||||||||||||