|
|
Updated Saturday, October 10, 2009 10:47 am TWN, The China Post news staff Betel nut tax would raise revenue and promote healthOf course, Dr. Yang wants to increase our tax revenues. Taiwan needs to either raise tax rates or find new taxes to try to repay its mountain of public debt, which one unofficial estimate puts at NT$19 trillion (US$600 billion). His one more rationale for levying the new tax is to make people healthier. Well, that is his job as health minister, isn't it? By now everybody knows betel nut chewing is closely related to incidences of cancer of the mouth. Our foreign readers in Taiwan must have seen quite a number of people spitting out “blood” at will while chewing the lime-filled nut everywhere they go. They're actually not spitting out blood. It is really just their own saliva mixed with the residue of the betel nut that they chew like chewing gum. However, chewing gum doesn't cause mouth cancer. Betel nut does. That's why Dr. Yang wants to help betel nut lovers kick their habit of chewing the likely carcinogen. His recommendation must be accepted at once, for it's one stone that kills two birds — to make people healthier and increase tax revenues at the same time. Cigarettes cause cancer. The cause-and-effect relation between cigarettes and cancer had been known for 20 years before it was reported first by the Kansas City Star, whose editor defied tobacco manufacturers who threatened to cut off all advertising. Without the paper's defiance, no tax would have been imposed on cigarettes, not to speak of the ban on cigarette ads almost everywhere across the world. If a heavy tax can be collected from cigarette smokers, there is no reason why a lighter tax can't be imposed on betel nut chewers. A cut in betel nut consumption, on the other hand, helps promote public health. At the very least, the unsightly scenes of “blood-spitting” in the street will be encountered less often. Should a tax be imposed, an addict would have to pay NT$2 to NT$3 (about a dime) more for a pack of 20 nuts. That's not much. We hope the tax would be heavier to help protect the health of the chewers. Our good-hearted health minister fears it will not be easy to collect the tax he is proposing. Unlike cigarettes, betel nuts on the market are not “manufactured.” It will be very difficult to collect the tax from vendors, who prepare the nuts themselves for customers. Will the government come up with a better way to collect the tax? Tax officials have to be creative. They shouldn't remain idle tax collectors. They should listen to Rene Descartes, whose immortal dictum is; “Cogito ergo sum” or “I think therefore I am.” Subscribe to The China Post and save 25%. Click here Comments October 15, 2009 dcslee2001@ What's wrong with the content of the editorial? It certainly makes more sense than the many bickering politicians on the island, and displays more courage too. October 16, 2009 rouenatla1B@ @dcslee2001Content is fine. Source isn't, which shows in the last paragraph. Consider this extract: "The German people are not a warlike nation. It is a soldierly one, which means it does not want a war, but does not fear it. It loves peace but also loves its honor and freedom." Content seems fine, also. Source = Adolf Hitler. (my choice of source and view of this newspaper's tendency are not coincidental) October 20, 2009 mtsai16@ It is my opinion that the Descarte quote is used opportunistically in this editorial. Descartes's dictum relates to one's wondering about self-existence and has nothing to do with creative thinking to justify one's official position. |
| |||||||||||||||
A typical example of a dogmatic nationalist editor prescribing the country's politicians what to do and how to do it, while also pretending to be well-read in philosophy.
This calls for another French 'dictum' which this editor should attempt to heed himself:
"The height of cleverness is being able to conceal it."
(Francois de La Rochefoucauld )