|
Updated Sunday, December 2, 2007 0:00 am TWN, By Meghan Daum, Special to the Los Angeles Times Reading with readers won’t make our bookshelves bareUnfortunately, my airborne research methods are about to be thwarted. Recently, the online bookseller Amazon unveiled Kindle, a US$399 wireless, hand-held reading “device” that weighs just 10.3 ounces and uses a glare-free display screen called electronic paper. Kindle can hold as many as 200 books and allows users to download almost 90,000 titles, including magazines, newspapers and blogs. All of these can be accessed, for a price, within 60 seconds without having to sync up to a computer or subscribe to a wireless plan. Electronic reading devices have a history of failure (Sony put out an e-book reader last year, and I doubt I’m the only one who never heard of it), but I’m willing to give Kindle the benefit of the doubt — and not just because the Amazon Web site features video testimonials from authors such as James Patterson talking about how it’s easier to use than a microwave oven. As someone whose livelihood is dependent on people reading, I’d be dumb to get too cranky about anything that facilitates the process. But I can’t help getting churlish about the other thing Kindle will undoubtedly do: make it a lot harder to indulge in the crucial cultural task of judging books — and the people who read them — by their covers. On the other hand, maybe we need Kindle more than we realize. It so happens that its appearance on the market coincides with the release of a National Endowment for the Arts report finding that Americans of all ages are reading both less frequently and less well than ever. And while there’s no telling whether a computerized widget is literacy’s last hope, I’d be remiss not to mention that in the time it took me to write this column, Amazon sold out of Kindles and placed them on back order. Daum is an essayist and novelist in Los Angeles. Subscribe to The China Post and save 25%. Click here |
Also in
Most Read | |||||||||||||