|
Updated Wednesday, December 24, 2008 7:49 pm TWN, By Nehginpao Kipgen, Special to The China Post Japan's action to accept Burma refugees changes Asia's imageJapan's policy toward Burma has traditionally been engagement. This principle was stated in uncertain terms by the then Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto to leaders of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in January 1997 as: “Japan does not feel international isolation is the optimal way for the improvement of domestic situation in Myanmar.” Ryutaro also added that: “Japan thinks it's important to give Myanmar incentives to behave in line with international norms by drawing it out as a member of the international community. Japan also thinks that ASEAN membership should not provide a smokescreen for oppression in Myanmar.” Engagement policy toward the Burmese military regime fundamentally differentiate Japan from many of her western allies, most notably the United States' isolationist policy. These conflicting approaches have not helped both the economic giants to achieve their desired goals, but have instead prolonged the military rule. Japan's initial hope for ASEAN leadership to address the situation in Burma has also turned out to be fruitless. Despite Japan's years of engagement policy, the oppression in Burma continues unabated. The recent arrests and the long-term prison sentences to peaceful protesters was an indication of a failed strategy. It is, however, intriguing to see that Japan simultaneously opens lines of communication with both the Burmese military regime and the pro-democracy opposition groups. Like many other nations, Japan has also endorsed the role of the United Nations Secretary General's good offices. With the political stalemate continuing to plague Burma, Japan's policy has seemingly vacillated in recent months. Japan's biggest western ally, the United States, has also theoretically shifted its policy. The U.S. Congress created a post for policy chief for Burma to increase pressure on the junta; the White House nominated Michael Green for the position on November 10. Related Stories Comments December 24, 2008 lskipgen@ Reply Going by the fact that China is a permanent member of the U.N. and also emerging as the new economic giant in the region, its role for change in Burma is much more crucial than that of Japan. Therefore, we need to lobby and convince Chinese leadership to act responsibly. |
![]() Also in Special to The China Post Most Read
| |||||||