|
|
Updated Thursday, October 8, 2009 10:12 am TWN, By Peter Brooke, Special to The China Post Why China worries the PentagonThey're not alone: China has big human-rights problems, especially as regards restive minorities such as the Tibetans and Uighurs (Chinese Muslims). And Beijing has limited entry by foreign companies into China's booming market of 1.3 billion people. Plus the Greens are unhappy with the “Middle Kingdom's” belching smokestacks, which make it the world's largest greenhouse-gas producer. But it's China's military, which was proudly paraded through Tiananmen Square on National Day, that caused the biggest worries. In a style reminiscent of the old Soviet Union, Beijing trotted out no less than 50 all-Chinese-made military systems during the spectacle. Many of the weapons weren't brand-new — but naval attaches probably strained their necks to see at least one system: the land-based DF-21 ballistic missile. This system — the world's first ballistic missile capable of hitting a moving target at sea — could be used to take out U.S. aircraft carriers in a Sino-American dust-up. The conventionally armed missile has maneuverable warheads and a range in excess of 1,000 miles. The Pentagon brass is worried. Other than hammering the DF-21 before it launches, the Navy has no high-level defense against the new Chinese missile. Also on the naval front, China is putting a lot of effort into power projection — that is, into being able to deploy its maritime might far beyond its coastal waters. For decades, Beijing ignored its navy in favor of the army. But today the Chinese navy is going to sea like never before, including at least one world cruise. It has one of the world's most robust shipbuilding programs, introducing more than 10 new ship and submarine classes since the early 1990s —giving Beijing the Pacific's second-largest navy. And Chinese aircraft carriers are likely in the future. Beijing is also going gangbusters on subs. The new Jin-class ballistic-missile submarines will carry the JL-2 ICBM, enhancing the survivability and deterrence of China's nuclear forces. Beijing's air force has a complement of new, home-built fighters. And the army is being downsized — but only while it's being modernized and professionalized for high-tech warfare. Then there's the stuff you can't see at parades — like China's hyperactive cyber- and counter-space warfare operations and capabilities, which focus on our slavish dependence on information technology and satellites. Beijing says its military buildup is no threat to regional peace and stability. Of course, its neighbors aren't convinced. As Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair noted earlier this year, Beijing's international behavior is driven by, among other things, a “longstanding ambition to see China play a role of a great power in East Asia and globally.” Security analysts typically calculate a threat by looking at military capabilities plus political intent. And we can clearly see China's military might growing. A defense buildup doesn't preordain conflict — but history suggests that it's a common outcome. Considering China's grand ambitions, what is Beijing's intent with its armed forces? Unfortunately, it's an answer we just can't get from a parade. Peter Brookes is a Heritage Foundation senior fellow and a former deputy assistant secretary of defense. peterbrookes@heritage.org Subscribe to The China Post and save 25%. Click here Comments October 9, 2009 boonfatt@ Reply For USA, bring your cargo ships instead of war ships, DF-21 has nothing to do with you. If you would like to test the DF-21 shooting range you are most welcomed. October 9, 2009 johnny.bryan@ Poor man becomes rich worries the rich men. To be safe, rich men includes the new comer must always stay in their own backyard, so that all the riches can be displayed and enjoy it. October 10, 2009 jw@ The US defense budget is ten times more than China's. It has 10000 nuclear warheads. China has 100. The problem is the US wants China to be like in Mao's time. In 1954, 58 and 65 the US threatened China with nuclear attack. Then if China did not give in to US's demands it would have been destroyed. The US can still destroy China x times over but China will make sure the US will be paying with unacceptable damage to its country. April 5, 2010 rm@ China is at present not much of a threat to the US. However it can defend itself which is to the chagrin of the US. In other words China must not fight back if under attack and let the US prevail.The Pentagon hawks can dream on for the next eons. The Chinese will build up the military not to challenge the US but to give a painful punch if under attack. April 6, 2010 elumpen@ What on earth are you lot wittering about? Nobody wants to attack China. What would that achieve? The reason other countries are worried is not because the Chinese have weapons (doesn't everyone?) but because too many of their leaders and military commanders are erratic, paranoid, racist, and not too clever. A bit like the posters on here, in fact. Nearly everyone wishes China well and hopes to see her emerge as a powerful and stable nation. What they DON'T want to see is a backward, small-minded dictatorship still grumbling about the humiliations of the long-distant past, inflicted by men who are long since dead. |
| |||||||||||||||