National identities inform policy and interests towards Pyongyang

In the midst of succession planning, members of Kim's family, the Korean People's Army and Korea Workers' Party have every incentive to stake out hardline positions — whether for purposes of internal competition or to deter international efforts to destabilize a regime in transition. The bigger picture, however, is that North Korea's behavior is driven by a particularly aggressive nationalism. With its economy a dramatic failure compared to South Korea's, North Korean pride and government legitimacy rely on demonstrations of military power and standing up to exaggerated external threats. North Korea's nuclear weapons and missiles have become integral parts of its national identity.

If an effective international response to North Korea is to be realized, the x-factor is not the outcome of deliberations at the United Nations or the diplomatic tone struck by the United States and Japan. The significant open question is how changing national identities in South Korea and China will inform those governments' interests and policies concerning Pyongyang.

Two previous administrations in South Korea engendered pan-Peninsula nationalism while enshrining democracy at the core of South Korea's national identity. The current administration of President Lee Myung-Bak came to office promising inter-Korean reciprocity and to re-brand South Korea as an innovative economic power. Recent developments challenge these national identity concepts.

North Korea's nuclear and missile tests, the fatal shooting of a South Korean tourist at the Mt. Kumgang resort, the detention of a South Korean businessman at the Kaesong manufacturing complex, and the nullification of various inter-Korean agreements have put pan-Peninsula identity on the defensive.

Meanwhile, the Lee administration's troubled interactions with opposition legislators, organized protesters, unfriendly media, and private citizens who question the government have progressives accusing Lee of turning back the clock on South Korea's hard-earned democracy. Such perceptions proliferated in the wake of former President Roh Moo-Hyun's apparent suicide following a government investigation into his family's financial dealings. Hundreds of thousands of South Koreans have publicly paid their respects to Roh, while criticizing the current leadership for allegedly not understanding South Korea's democratic identity. This adds up to a daunting task for a South Korean president already facing a global recession that hinders his economic goals for the country. As progressives mobilize around Roh's death and conservatives focus on North Korea's provocations, many South Koreans feel they are in a battle for their national soul. Without public support, the South Korean government will have difficulty coordinating policies with the U.S. and Japan. So the main question before Lee's summit with President Obama in mid-June is how well his administration can bridge the divides in South Korean society.

1|2|Next Page>>

SharePrintEmail

Write a Comment

Terms

Enter your comments - 3000 characters max

Type in image code

Submit

 Receive China Post promos
 Respond to this email