|
Updated Monday, June 22, 2009 11:11 am TWN, By Joe Hung, Special to The China Post Sovereignty over the Spratly IslandsThe four groups are Tungsha (East Sand), Hsisha (West Sand), Chungsha (Middle Sand), and Nansha (South Sand). The first two are known worldwide as the Pratas and Paracel Islands. Middle Sand is called the Macclesfield Bank, while the last is named the Spratly Islands. According to the Constitution, all four are part of the territory of the Republic of China. However, Taipei is almost powerless to protect its interests in the area under whose waters are found an estimated 7.7 billion barrels of oil, comparable to the reserves in the Arabian Gulf. Taipei's sovereignty over the four small archipelagoes is challenged by the People's Republic of China, the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam and Brunei. Their claim of sovereignty, except Beijing's, is untenable at best. The only one of the island groups Taiwan still can assert total sovereignty is Tungsha (Pratas Islands), which Chinese started developing during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). Qing China made the islets part of its territory in 1730. Of course, no countries in the world contested its sovereignty. In 1909, Tsai Kang, governor of Guangdong, had a stone marker erected on Tungsha Island, the largest of the Pratas group, to claim Chinese sovereignty again. The Pratas Islands were occupied by the Japanese in 1939, during the undeclared Sino-Japanese war. The Japanese made them part of the territory of Taiwan under their colonial rule. Named Shinnan-gunto (New South Islands), the Pratas group was placed under the jurisdiction of Takao-shu (Kaohsiung Prefecture). It was restored to the Republic of China as part of the province of Guangdong at the end of the Second World War in 1945. After the Chinese civil war, however, the government of the Republic of China which was moved to Taipei placed the Pratas group under the jurisdiction of the special municipality of Kaohsiung in 1979. A national monument and a corridor were set up on the main island on June 30, 1989 and May 19, 1992 respectively, to assert sovereignty over the entire archipelago. A hospital, power station, and runway have been established, too. A service center was also opened to provide help for fishermen operating in the South China Sea. There are three jetties and an onshore service center which gives directions to fishing boats. Incidentally, the special municipality of Kaohsiung extends its jurisdiction over the Spratly Islands as well. Chinese discovered the Spratlys much earlier, as early as during the Later Han Dynasty (25-220). The History of the Mongol Yuan Dynasty (1206-1368) records naval patrols of the waters off Nansha (Spratly Islands). In the official maps of the Ming Dynasty, the Spratlys are marked as part of Chinese territory. They are so marked repeatedly in official maps published from 1724 to 1817. Comments June 23, 2009 THvothuongsu@ Reply China's hegemonistic ambition is a threat to world peace in the 21st century. July 3, 2009 lht1965@ All information is a lie. Paracels and Spratly belong to Vietnam. In 1974, China had a quick war over Vietnam and took over Paracels; in 1988, they repeated the same action to the Vietnam and occupied few more of Spratly. From 1949, China has many conflicts with most of its neighbors and always lose!!! Japan should be your historical lesson. A step too far, you will lose. Winner will take it all. US will not let you do whatever you want. July 6, 2009 getreal@ The Islands of Paracels and Spratly does belong to Vietnam so please get out of their country and leave the Vietnamese people alone. October 16, 2009 yiyefan1000@ Those countries who do not have any strong evidence always try to play a card: China's hegemonistic ambition. Everything should be based on evidence. China's claims have been supported by numerous maps and historic records. Smaller countries want to challenge China by gaining sympathy from other bigger powers, e.g. US. How shameless and brazen! October 17, 2009 ludahai_twn@ @yiyefan -- Historic maps and fishing rights do not confer sovereignty in international law. Vietnamese and Cham fishermen have been using those islets for fishing FAR LONGER than the Chinese had. Furthermore, the ROC stated in 1928 that the Paracel Islands were the southernmost territory in its country, NOT the Spratly. More -- those islands were administered as a part of Cochin China by the French from Saigon until 1954 when the Vietnamese won the battle of Dien Bien Phu.Historically, at least the western half of the Spratly's belongs to Viet Nam, NOT to China (or Taiwan). Taiwan should focus on the Tiaoyutai Island issue where its claim is FAR STRONGER. October 19, 2009 glory@ lht1965-Sure and yes. We Chinese are so weak and can’t match with the world’s one and only super power Vietnam that conquered Paris, Tokyo and Washington D.C. And now we Chinese are still so weak to defend our island Paracel and Splatly islands. But we can defend our island with our WILL POWER and MORAL POWER to survive when the Big Boy Vietnam will send all their mighty military machine against us. October 20, 2009 centxiao@ History can not be denied by Vietnamese propaganda. International law also respect history. Little Comrade: you should shut up. October 20, 2009 superkinez@ Hey Vietnamese friends! Are you serious about these insults you are throwing around? I can see that you are angry, but get real, China will always be a regional power and will own all of these islands. Now accept it and live with it. October 22, 2009 daotk75@ If TW wants to be independent, TW should support VN to gain back Paracel Island. October 29, 2009 elumpen@ Grow up guys. Who cares about a few lumps of rock in the middle of nowhere? They don't "belong" to anyone, and there's certainly no obvious reason why they should belong to Taiwan. They belong to the people who live there. Would you like China to apply your logic to the question of who Taiwan "belongs" to?If the politicians had any smarts they would arrange for the Spratly islands to be used as centers of co-operation (military, commercial, tourist, whatever) between claimant countries; everybody wins. Unfortunately, they don't, so they won't, and everyone loses and gets to fling mud around. |
![]() Also in Joe Hung
Most Read
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||