Breaking News, World News and Taiwan News.

Rio case shows China should clarify its 'state secrets' law

Last month Beijing detained the head of Rio Tinto's multibillion dollar iron ore business in China, Stern Hu, an Australian citizen, as well as three Chinese employees. Three days later Australia's Foreign Minister Stephen Smith announced that the men were being held on accusations of bribery and stealing state secrets.

Shortly thereafter, China criticized Australia for giving a visa to Rebiya Kadeer, the former Uighur businesswoman whom Beijing has accused of being responsible for the July 5 riot in Urumqi.

Chinese officials demanded that a film about her at the Melbourne International Film Festival—”The Ten Conditions of Love”—be withdrawn from the Melbourne International Film Festival and that she not be allowed to address the National Press Club in Canberra.

These events had an effect not only on Australians but on the international business community as a whole. There was much speculation that China was lashing out at Australia because Rio Tinto had rejected an offer from a Chinese state-owned company, Chinalco, to expand its stake in Rio Tinto from 9.32 percent to 18% percent in China's largest foreign investment in history.

If China's intention was to send a message to the international business community, it was hugely successful. Many multinational companies became fearful that they, too, could become targets in similar state secrets cases.

This is because the definition of state secrets is extremely vague. They may have to do with defense, foreign policy, economic and social development, science and technology, criminal investigations or “other matters” classified as state secrets, even if the information is already in the public domain.

The case took a bizarre turn when a Web site associated with China's National Administration for the Protection of State Secrets Bureau alleged that Rio Tinto had engaged in spying in China for at least six years and over that time caused China to spend an additional US$100 billion on iron ore imports, a sum that it said was equivalent to 10 percent of Australia's GDP.

This allegation was peculiar because, in the last six years, China's iron ore imports from Australia amounted to about US$90 billion. So, if the figures on the state secrets Web site are to be taken at face value, it would mean that China should have received the iron ore for free and on top of that been awarded a US$10 billion bonus.

Write a Comment
CAPTCHA Code Image
Type in image code
Change the code
 Receive China Post promos
 Respond to this email
Sponsors
Save 70% for hotel in Shanghai and 6000 hotels, in Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and all China.
Get the best deals for Guangzhou Hotels or choose from more than 10,000 hotels in 499 Chinese cities.
Find great real time deals on China Flights. Book flights to China or China domestic flights 24/7.
Buy china wholesale products from reliable chinese wholesalers on DHgate.com!
Subscribe  |   Advertise  |   RSS Feed  |   About Us  |   Career  |   Contact Us
Sitemap  |   Top Stories  |   Taiwan  |   China  |   Business  |   Asia  |   World  |   Sports  |   Life  |   Arts & Leisure  |   Health  |   Editorial  |   Commentary
Travel  |   Movies  |   TV Listings  |   Classifieds  |   Bookstore  |   Getting Around  |   Weather  |   Guide Post  |   Student Post  |   English Courses  |   Terms of Use  |   Sitemap
  chinapost search