|
|
Updated Tuesday, September 7, 2010 9:42 pm TWN, By Dan Strumpf, AP |
| ||||||||||||
One 'censored' bar won't stop online sex tradeSome ads still carried in Craigslist's personals section look like they could fall in similar territory. “I am the perfect lunchtime or after-5 companion for businessmen that jet-set, work long hours or have family obligations,” read one ad in the casual encounters section, appearing to advertise massages. Craiglist's personal ads, which are free, are not regularly vetted. M. Ryan Calo, a senior research fellow at the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School, said ads for sexual services could become harder to monitor if they begin migrating back into the personals. It also could be more challenging for law enforcement to pick out the illegal ads. “Instead of being in small stream, it's going to be in a big ocean,” Calo said. Those trying to sell sex who give up on Craiglist have many other sites to choose from. As Craigslist users complained about the company's move in postings Sunday, some rattled off the names of other sites where they could find the same services. Getting such ads removed from other sites is the next goal, said Malika Saada Saar, executive director of the Rebecca Project for Human Rights, a group that has been involved in pressuring Craigslist to block adult services ads. “The issue isn't going after a particular company,” Saar said, “the issue is going after children being sold for sex online.” Palfrey said Craiglist's decision is likely to cause other online classified pages to think twice about the ads on their sites. Backpage.com, an online classifieds page similar to Craigslist owned by the alternative newspaper chain Village Voice Media, has an “adult entertainment” section that is highly explicit and features ads for a wide array of sexual services. In a May blog post, Craigslist's Buckmaster said the company's ads were no worse than those published by Village Voice Media. He cited one explicit ad that included the phrase: “anything goes US$90.” An attempt to reach Village Voice Media on Sunday was unsuccessful. | |||||||||||||