Breaking News, World News and Taiwan News.

Updated Wednesday, February 20, 2008 0:00 am TWN, By Mark Jewell, AP



	A “ for sale” sign sits in the front yard of a house on the same street of Mary Kamanu’s home in Folsom, California, U.S., on Tuesday, Feb. 12. When Kamanu paid US$409,000 for a house in Folsom, California, she never imagined that three years later it would be worth about 20 percent less and she would have to pay the bank more than US$80,000 just to sell the place. (Bloomberg) Enlarge Photo

Sponsors
▪	Get the best deals for Guangzhou Hotels or choose from more than 10,000 hotels in 499 Chinese cities.
▪	Find great real time deals on China Flights. Book flights to China or China domestic flights 24/7.
▪	Buy china wholesale products from reliable chinese wholesalers on DHgate.com!
▪	Save 75% for all hotels in Shanghai, Beijing and whole China. Lowest rates for Flights in China.

Regulators pursue Wall Street’s subprime role

BOSTON -- Regulators are trying to punish Wall Street for mortgage finance practices that expanded home ownership and spread risk among a host of new players — but also may have tricked borrowers and investors who supplied cash to fuel a housing boom that has collapsed.

A handful of state securities regulators and a couple foreclosure-blighted cities have fired the opening shots with lawsuits trying to prove that investment banks and big lenders are guilty of more than just bad business decisions and failing to foresee looming mortgage troubles. Some regulators say greed and fraud underlie much of the subprime mortgage mess that has spread across the broader housing market, triggering a spike in foreclosures.

Aside from the civil cases, the FBI is looking at possible criminal action, focusing on what Wall Street firms knew about the risks of mortgage securities backed by subprime loans, and whether they hid risks from investors.

Observers do not expect the financial penalties that regulators extract in the civil cases to be massive. But the cases could turn up evidence that forces Wall Street to defend itself amid growing talk of government help to ease subprime-related financial strains on bond insurers. Revelations of bad behavior turned up by the government also could spur private investors to file even more lawsuits than the hundreds they’ve already brought to recover losses.

“This could get a lot nastier, for many reasons,” said John Akula, a business law lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management. “Prolonged close scrutiny often turns up all kinds of dubious practices that in normal times are under the radar. “If the government sponsors any kind of bailout with public funds, this may be coupled with an aggressive prosecutorial agenda in support of efforts to get private parties to kick in.”

Although the foreclosure-blighted cities of Cleveland and Baltimore have sued seeking to recover damages from mortgage lenders, most of the cases filed so far are from regulators alleging violations of state securities laws.

Attorneys general in New York and Ohio are targeting alleged systematic inflation of home appraisals by major lenders and appraisal firms. Litigation in Massachusetts and other states seeks to demonstrate that investment banks failed to disclose risks to investors who bought mortgage-related securities and weren’t up front about conflicts of interest across their far-flung financial operations, including trading of subprime investments. “Over the years, the relationship between lender and borrower and a particular piece of property has been severed,” said Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin. “It’s clear that it’s become a runaway train.”

1|2|Next Page>>