Breaking News, World News and Taiwan News.

Singapore plans to keep gay sex ban: report

SINGAPORE -- Singapore will keep its ban on gay sex, declining to follow the lead of an Indian court that threw out a similar British colonial-era law last week, a newspaper reported Monday.

The state-owned New Paper quoted Law Minister K. Shanmugam as saying the law will remain because most Singaporeans don't accept homosexuality.

However, Shanmugam pledged the government would not enforce the law.

“We sometimes in these things have to accept a bit of messiness,” Shanmugam told a neighborhood residents' meeting, according to the paper. “The way the society is going, we don't think it's fair for us to prosecute people who say that they are homosexual.”

The Delhi High Court ruled last week that treating consensual gay sex between adults as a crime is a violation of fundamental rights protected by India's constitution. The ruling, the first of its kind in India, is not binding outside New Delhi.

Under Singaporean law, sex between homosexuals is punishable by two years in jail.

Singapore legalized oral and anal sex between heterosexual couples in 2007.

Subscribe to The China Post and save 25%. Click here
Comments
July 12, 2009    GregV@
This antiquated law and the excuse for keeping it are ridiculous. Most Singaporeans may or may not accept homosexuality, but that is beside the point.

There is no majority in Singapore that accepts all kinds of things, such as (in regards to religion) Jesus as savior or the Buddha's teachings or the gods of Hinduism. Most Singaporeans may or may not accept another race as their equal or another language.

But Singapore is a diverse society. Ultimately, the only road to peace and true harmony is for the government to set the example of respecting all members of society as equals.

Expecting same-sex couples to live secret lives under threat of an outdated law is no different than if the government were to tell Tamils that they must not let their language be heard in public or to tell Hindus that they must not mention their religion so as not to "offend" monotheists.

If the government does not set the example of treating all citizens with equal respect, this only legitimizes negative and discriminatory attitudes among others in society.

Singapore should move into the 21st century and rid itself of outdated and discriminatory laws that were imposed by a colonial power that no longer exists. The rest of the developed world has moved on and so should Singapore.
March 7, 2010    wong_clara80@
GregV@ wrote:
This antiquated law and the excuse for keeping it are ridiculous. Most Singaporeans may or may not accept homosexuality, but that is beside the point.

There is no majority in Singapore that accepts all kinds of things, such as (in regards to religion) Jesus as savior or the Buddha's teachings or the gods of Hinduism. Most Singaporeans may or may not accept another race as their equal or another language.

But Singapore is a diverse society. Ultimately, the only road to peace and true harmony is for the government to set the example of respecting all members of society as equals.

Expecting same-sex couples to live secret lives under threat of an outdated law is no different than if the government were to tell Tamils that they must not let their language be heard in public or to tell Hindus that they must not mention their religion so as not to "offend" monotheists.

If the government does not set the example of treating all citizens with equal respect, this only legitimizes negative and discriminatory attitudes among others in society.

Singapore should move into the 21st century and rid itself of outdated and discriminatory laws that were imposed by a colonial power that no longer exists. The rest of the developed world has moved on and so should Singapore.
Sexual orientation and race are two different things which cannot be compared on the same level at any time. Discriminating people by their race is extremely shallow and derogatory, because colour is only skin-deep and the cultures that are behind every race are but with a common goal: to survive adversities as a society through GENERATIONS.

Homosexuality on the other hand, involve taking foolish risks by engaging in anal sex - and statistics have shown that the majority of male homosexuals (60%, out of which 45% are HIV-positive) engage in this act - and this, by NO MEANS should be condoned or advocated in any way for the good of the society and the generations to come. HENCE, any government of any state holds the right to ban this irresponsible lifestyle which by no means has the society's interest at heart, and which motives are driven by selfish desires of pleasure, pride and denial.
March 10, 2010    elumpen@
I wonder if Singapore employs freelance perverts to peer in peoples windows to see EXACTLY which bit of their anatomy they're putting in which orifice (a la Viz Magazine's "bottom inspectors"), and handing out on-the-spot tickets accordingly ... if not, it sounds like one hard-to-enforce law.
Write a Comment
CAPTCHA Code Image
Type in image code
Change the code
 Receive China Post promos
 Respond to this email
Sponsors
Find great real time deals on China Flights. Book flights to China or China domestic flights 24/7.
Buy china wholesale products from reliable chinese wholesalers on DHgate.com!
Save 70% for hotel in Shanghai and 6000 hotels, in Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and all China.
Get the best deals for Guangzhou Hotels or choose from more than 10,000 hotels in 499 Chinese cities.
Subscribe  |   Advertise  |   RSS Feed  |   About Us  |   Career  |   Contact Us
Sitemap  |   Top Stories  |   Taiwan  |   China  |   Business  |   Asia  |   World  |   Sports  |   Life  |   Arts & Leisure  |   Health  |   Editorial  |   Commentary
Travel  |   Movies  |   TV Listings  |   Classifieds  |   Bookstore  |   Getting Around  |   Weather  |   Guide Post  |   Student Post  |   English Courses  |   Terms of Use  |   Sitemap
  chinapost search